Comments

Luke Wanless
05/05/2013 6:55pm

No, Beacause biodiversity encumpasses all living creatures so if we focuss on one it will over populate and throw everthing out of balance.

Reply
Conor Thomas
05/05/2013 7:11pm

I disagree.

Reply
Conor
05/05/2013 6:57pm

I think that we should save the more important animals in the food chains and webs because there would still be a reasonably large number of less important animals at the bottom of the food chain where if we saved the predators they would still keep them in line.

Reply
05/05/2013 7:02pm

I think that is incorrect because you imply that the predators are the important creatures when the smaller creatures and plants are the organisms that if killed can make all of the animal's food supply decrease, then eventually die out.

Reply
05/05/2013 6:57pm

We should try to save every endangered species, simply because they are part of the food chain and food webs which if affected can cause other animal species and even humans die out.

Reply
Charlie Cooke
05/05/2013 6:58pm

I believe that we should try to save all speices because if one of them is wiped out it could kill all of the other animals or make them endangered and that wouldn't be good for animals and people.

Reply
Emile Neethling
05/05/2013 6:58pm

The more important species must be saved first because they will become extinct faster for their different properties

Reply
harry shakespeare-davies
05/05/2013 7:02pm

I don't agree because, if you just look after the 'important' animals then they wont have anything to eat if you dont look after the 'nonimportant' animals.

Reply
Harry Shakespeare-Davies
05/05/2013 6:58pm

We should save every animal if we can because if we take out an animal in the enviroment it will corrupt the food chains/webs therefore effect the area around it in an negetive way.

Reply
David Sullivan
05/05/2013 6:58pm

We should try to save all of the species that are endangered if we can, but have the most work on the most important ones until they are safe.

Reply
Harry Shakespeare-Davies
05/05/2013 7:08pm

I think that is the best opionion so far because if we spread the work out the extreamly endangered animals might not hang on just long enough, so therefore it is a very smart opionion.

Reply
Damon Argaet
05/05/2013 6:59pm

I think its important to save as many animals as we can because wildlife is a nice thing in nature.

Reply
Jack Brennan
05/05/2013 6:59pm

We should save all endangered animals because their part of the food chain.

Reply
05/05/2013 7:00pm

I think that we should work to save all the animals because if we focuses on one and others become extinct and through the balance off.

Reply
jack McGrath
05/05/2013 7:02pm

I agree we should save the animal from dying out.

Reply
Jack Stuart
05/05/2013 7:00pm

I think that we should put more effort into saving the critically endangered animals than putting all of our effort into the endangered animals and letting the critically endangered animals become extinct.

Reply
Ryan Hilden
05/05/2013 7:00pm

It depends what species you save you should try harder to save the more endangered ones and if you kill of one of the species than it could kill of the endangered ones you tried to save.

Reply
Blair Paterson
05/05/2013 7:01pm

We should try to save all of the animals. If we only save one of the other species then the other species will go all wacky.

Reply
Jack McGrath
05/05/2013 7:01pm

We should try and save some of the animals that are becoming endangered because of the animals that are feeding off it and that will basically end the food chain and kill the other animals because they have nothing to feed off and die.

Reply
Karam Khoury
05/05/2013 7:01pm

No, because all of the species are important in the food chain and will affect other species.

Reply
LOchlan Hill
05/05/2013 7:02pm

I think that all of the animals should be saved because if one dies off than every other animal will be effected by it dying

Reply
Sam
05/05/2013 7:03pm

I think that we should try to save every animal because all the animals are the same impotants and if one dies then an impotants one mite die.

Reply
05/05/2013 7:04pm

I think we should try to save every endangered species because if there are some animals extinct, then the animals will not have food or more bad animals e.g. mouse.

Reply
Tom Bloemendal
05/05/2013 7:05pm

We should save all of the endangered species because the food chain would be curupt and it would eventually affect every animal.

Reply
David Sullivan
05/05/2013 7:09pm

We would all die!

Reply
Sam Squire
05/06/2013 12:37am

I think David is corect [:-{)]




Leave a Reply